Indistinguishable From Magic Avatar

3238 Notes

lexxercise:


joannaestep:


escargod:


ugh, exactly. that’s why i draw with my eyes shut. just to keep out all those horrid outside influences, you know?
and when i get jury summons. i make sure i’ve got my mp3 player in with me to drown out all that relevant information so i can make my judgement based on absolutely nothing at all. same thing when i’m voting. i just drop my pen onto the ballot paper and hope it makes a tick in one of the boxes. heck, i’m reblogging this post with commentary and i didn’t even read it. i have no respect for people who put any research into what they’re doing whatsoever. they’re just gross.


Reblogging for amazing comment.


OP, how…. how do you think master painters work? Illustrators? Do you think professionals at Disney or Pixar or Ghibli work without references? That they’re just magically able to accurately draw architecture and animals and natural looking movement without references?
Using a reference doesn’t mean copying an existing piece of art; that’s just copying. It means researching your subject matter and using your research (often visual) to create stronger, more accurate work. It’s not just “okay,” it’s necessary to attain the level of skill the artists you admire exhibit. These artists don’t generally rely heavily on references for every piece, either. They look up what they need, learn from using it, and are able to absorb that knowledge for use in future work.
This may not change how you and those who share your sentiment feel about it, but I urge you to look a little deeper into what using references really means, as it would appear your understanding of the subject is fairly shallow.


Exactly. I’d take it even further and say that “reference” is just one particular incarnation of what artists should always be doing, which is taking reality and making it their own. Art is a digestive process in that way; there’s no such thing as a vacuum in nature or in the creative fields, and the fact that you can trace where something comes from has no bearing on the quality of the work. If it’s a shameless copy of some sort, then the quality will speak for itself, and so on.

lexxercise:

joannaestep:

escargod:

ugh, exactly. that’s why i draw with my eyes shut. just to keep out all those horrid outside influences, you know?

and when i get jury summons. i make sure i’ve got my mp3 player in with me to drown out all that relevant information so i can make my judgement based on absolutely nothing at all. same thing when i’m voting. i just drop my pen onto the ballot paper and hope it makes a tick in one of the boxes. heck, i’m reblogging this post with commentary and i didn’t even read it. i have no respect for people who put any research into what they’re doing whatsoever. they’re just gross.

Reblogging for amazing comment.

OP, how…. how do you think master painters work? Illustrators? Do you think professionals at Disney or Pixar or Ghibli work without references? That they’re just magically able to accurately draw architecture and animals and natural looking movement without references?

Using a reference doesn’t mean copying an existing piece of art; that’s just copying. It means researching your subject matter and using your research (often visual) to create stronger, more accurate work. It’s not just “okay,” it’s necessary to attain the level of skill the artists you admire exhibit. These artists don’t generally rely heavily on references for every piece, either. They look up what they need, learn from using it, and are able to absorb that knowledge for use in future work.

This may not change how you and those who share your sentiment feel about it, but I urge you to look a little deeper into what using references really means, as it would appear your understanding of the subject is fairly shallow.

Exactly. I’d take it even further and say that “reference” is just one particular incarnation of what artists should always be doing, which is taking reality and making it their own. Art is a digestive process in that way; there’s no such thing as a vacuum in nature or in the creative fields, and the fact that you can trace where something comes from has no bearing on the quality of the work. If it’s a shameless copy of some sort, then the quality will speak for itself, and so on.

Replies

Likes

  1. jessicamorgasm reblogged this from lexxercise
  2. dangobrango reblogged this from lustyscripps
  3. magicchaos reblogged this from angsty-little-lolita
  4. lustyscripps reblogged this from easily-missed-amestris-basket
  5. easily-missed-amestris-basket reblogged this from anfang-stern
  6. anfang-stern reblogged this from angsty-little-lolita
  7. spottycows reblogged this from the-cheshire-cat-in-the-hat
  8. the-cheshire-cat-in-the-hat reblogged this from kyoya-sexual
  9. ch-ar-ch-ar reblogged this from soiwillburnmydead
  10. draco-nights reblogged this from kyoya-sexual
  11. soiwillburnmydead reblogged this from angsty-little-lolita
  12. kyoya-sexual reblogged this from surrealscorpion
  13. angsty-little-lolita reblogged this from surrealscorpion
  14. surrealscorpion reblogged this from lexxercise
  15. crash-dragon reblogged this from mc-butternipples
  16. mc-butternipples reblogged this from attack-on-my-dick
  17. captain-axhirs reblogged this from attack-on-my-dick
  18. attack-on-my-dick reblogged this from bubblejuices
  19. bubblejuices reblogged this from skepticarcher
  20. potentiallydangerous reblogged this from lexxercise
  21. delightfullyalluring reblogged this from lesbiven
  22. pikayu reblogged this from wordweaver1001
  23. wordweaver1001 reblogged this from foresabaly
  24. milesedgy reblogged this from foresabaly
  25. foresabaly reblogged this from lexxercise
  26. ozziescribbler reblogged this from dresdencodak
  27. linden-flowers reblogged this from pleg
  28. kingofincoherencyresources reblogged this from gastrophobia
  29. onelittleorange reblogged this from brakinja
  30. brakinja reblogged this from lexxercise and added:
    ^^^^^^ Aaaaaaand now I’m following this person.
  31. gatorfucker reblogged this from steven-kun
  32. kittys--master reblogged this from steven-kun

 

Reblogs